This typescript is a transcription of document .200306a, record 19334. To it Colette has added some annotations in pencil.

There is another transcription, document .052410, record 99872.

There is also a literary version of this letter, document .052388, record 99853.

Two sentences from this letter were published in After Ten Years, p. 125.

The original letter is document .200313, record 19318.

There are two other typed versions:

Literary version: document .052390, record 99855.
The Autobiography version: document .007052fm, record 93479.

Russell v. Russell: note.

On a legal issue and the strategy ahead.

Re John Russell v his trustees; Kate Russell v her trustees.

Document contains: (1) the omnibus bundle of correspondence since the papers were placed before counsel; (2) statement of Mr. Tom Helm taken on 15 June 1934; (3) report of investigations on Wednesday, 20 June 1934 by Mr. L.P. Tylor and a further statement from Tom Helm; (4) draft letter to the King's Proctor.

Re Russell divorce.

The document refers to the decree made on 22 November 1934 that the marriage between Dora and BR be dissolved, "... by reason that since the celebration thereof the said respondent had been guilty of adultery unless sufficient cause be shown to the court why the said decree should not be absolute within six months from the making thereof, and no such cause having been shown the court on application of the said petitioner by final decree pronounced and declared the said marriage dissolved."

Document is a receipt showing that £39.13.8 has been received by Coward, Chance & Co. for charges and disbursements on BR's account.

Document outlines the charges to BR's account with Coward, Chance & Co. and details what these charges are.

Re Russell divorce.

Document is BR's autobiographical affidavit, presented by Coward, Chance & Co. The paragraphs are numbered.

BR mentions his meeting Dora, and dissolution of his first marriage, and also that John and Kate Russell are he and Dora's only children.

BR details the events of his marriage, discussing Dora's infidelities and outlining his encounter, and gradual affair, with Patricia Spence.

He first heard of Dora committing adultery in 1926, with the act occurring in 1924. However, he chose to forgive her and took no action against it. "Next year, however, in 1927, there began a series of differences between us which from the beginning in my opinion made further successful married life impossible, and which finally led to my leaving her in April 1932. I should have taken this step earlier, but for two reasons: first, I was most anxious for the sake of the children that our joint household should not be broken up while even the remotest chance of its continuance existed; second, I was very anxious for the success of Beacon Hill School, a school for small children which Dora and I had started near Petersfield in 1927."

BR outlines his visit to Beacon Hill School in February 1934, stating that the school was disgustingly dirty and insanitary.

A Deed Poll by Bertrand Arthur William Earl Russell.

Deed Poll is to appoint a guardian for John and Kate Russell. This copy has not been filled in and is unsigned.

Re schedule of documents held for safe custody on behalf of Lord Russell.

Document lists documents held for BR, detailing what they are, dates, and where they were found. There are letters, deeds and stock certificates.

"This is the copy of the accounts marked 'D.W.R.2' referred to in the affidavit of Dora Winifred Russell Countess Russell affirmed to before me this 11th day of March 1936."

The document details the profit and loss account and auditor's report for Beacon Hill School, year ended 31 March 1935.

The document is a draft of BR's will, which has notes on it by Crompton Llewelyn Davies.

The document outlines BR's finances, with notes regarding payments to Dora, etc., ending with BR and Dora's total gross income. BR's investment income was £460, and he earned £676.

Re Russell v Russell.

Rowe & Maw inform Coward, Chance that the President refused to deal with the petition, and an application will be made to the judge on the further hearing of this case, enclosing a copy of the discretion statement (not present). "This is to give you an opportunity if you so desire of coming to the court and objecting as it appears to us that you may think it is a breach under our client's deed of separation."

BR tells Lloyd that he has been abroad. He tells Lloyd (regarding being a trustee) that he should have no work, aside from signing a few documents every few years. He also tells Lloyd he would like to get his will signed before he leaves for America 18 September.

BR tells Lloyd that Meynell wrote asking to see him, to which he first agreed. However, upon reflection he thought he would be misleading Meynell if he pretended to be willing to negotiate the petition, leading BR to decline. BR informs Lloyd of Meynell's threats that he and Lloyd will oppose BR, and BR writes Lloyd asking if this is true.

Document is original of document .133983, record 113335.

BR thanks Lloyd for his letter, explaining that there was a misunderstanding that has been cleared up.

BR writes that he wishes to say a few words about trusteeship, which he lists in three points. Dora is getting a benefit from the abolition of the dum casta clause, that BR must have security against complete destitution, and if Dora "... says 'oh but I should always be reasonable' you may retort that I should always be reasonable about her chastity."

"If I am to rely on her reasonableness, she must rely on mine. Certain actions 'hang together logically and arithmetically,' she can't have one without the other."

Lloyd writes in reply to Dora's letter of 24 January, informing Dora that he sympathizes with her, and does not expect her to agree with Meynell and himself.

"We have had the difficult task of deciding between two different views", with Meynell and Lloyd ultimately deciding that there was no reason to take the children out of Dartington. Lloyd points out to Dora, that as she mentioned, he is not predisposed towards Dartington, having taken his own child out, though he states it was for more personal reasons, and the school has improved tremendously since.

"I am extremely sorry to have had to decide against your wishes in this case; but I am convinced that any impartial arbitrator would have had to do the same."

A carbon copy of this letter is attached. The ribbon copy is marked "Copy".

Dora writes to both Lloyd and Meynell that her opinion about Dartington's unsuitability has been reinforced over the holidays, especially for John. "I must therefore ask that notice be given for them to leave in July. The period of one year for which I gave my consent until things were more settled and plans were more certain is up in July. There are subjects that the children want to learn that they cannot or do not like to learn at Dartington, and I am definitely of the opinion that they would have a better and less expensive education with me, together with the advantage of closer individual care of their health and psychology, and a greater sense of home life and general security, both of which are lacking to them at present."

Document outlines the dates and notes enclosures of Meynell's correspondence.

This is an archival list made before August 1966 (when BR's archives were taken to London).

BR asks Meynell to act as a trustee for John and Kate's trust funds, as Sanger is too ill to act as trustee any longer. "There would be no work involved after the signing of the initial transfers, as I do not propose to add to the funds or to change the investments except when it is absolutely necessary."

Meynell tells BR that BR's letter asking Meynell not to forward the proposals or demands from Dora disturbs him. Meynell has received the same request from Davies, and encloses his reply for BR to read (document .102110, record 116263).

"I want you to believe that one of my motives for being concerned in the affair at all is to save you as much as I can from the wear and tear of your feelings."

Enclosed with document .102109, record 116262.

Meynell tells Davies he is sorry that Davies does not agree with Meynell's sending BR Dora's demand about the children. "I must make it clear to both you and him that I cannot accept the responsibility of saying 'no' to her when she makes a formal demand of Bertie and accompanies it with what in effect is a threat."

Meynell informs BR that he has written to Dora regarding Williams-Ellis's invitation and regarding the general principles of such invitations. "I make it my own suggestion that if neither parent objects to an invitation, the time so occupied should be deducted from the whole time and the balance divided between the parents. If either parent object to this particular invitation then the other must allocate his or her own time to it. This will prevent either parent promoting invitations which may diminish the amount of time the children would have to spend with the other."

Meynell also informs BR that he wrote to Dora asking if she would like a witness to the tossing.

Meynell informs BR that he, in the presence of his clerk, flipped a coin to decide who should get the children for the first part of the holidays and BR "won".

"Dora says she will not agree to consider the Williams-Ellis's invitation as covering neutral time. I have not discussed this with Lloyd but if the principle which I set out in my letter to you and to Dora has your acquiescence, as it has hers, this objection must, I think, carry."

BR has noted dates at the top of the letter.

Meynell informs BR that Dora contests BR's view that he is owed nine extra days of holiday. Meynell quotes Dora's letter, as he is not sufficiently aware of the situation.

Dora's letter to Meynell is quoted as saying, "There are not nine extra days due to Bertie, the position is this: last summer term he kept the children ten extra days because they overheard a man in a shop say that he had diphtheria in his house. When the children knew they were going to Dartington John said he wished to spend half the summer holidays with me, you will remember that I mentioned this to you. It was doubtful to question whether the division of the holidays should begin from then or now, I gave Bertie the benefit of the doubt and asked to have the children in Cornwall for two weeks, ten days of which were clearly due to me."

Dora recounts that she had the children for fourteen days, or fifteen if you include their day on the train, and she never claimed the days BR had the children during the school year, and wouldn't have done so now if it weren't for BR's claim.

BR has noted dates at the top of the verso of the letter.

BR tells Meynell that his records are incomplete and cannot prove his claim to more than seven days, though he thought it was more. He addresses his claims in four points.

Regarding diphtheria BR states that Beacon Hill requires a certificate of non-contact with infection signed by a doctor, "The Dr. at Portmadoc, who knew there was diphtheria in the neighbourhood, refused to sign, after hearing what had occurred. By Dora's regulations, I could not send the children back, but agreed to make up the time to her later."

BR states that here is no doubt that the last holidays were due wholly to him, as the sequence was term, holiday, term, holiday, so the new arrangement should begin such as the old. He also states that Dora had the children from August 16-31 in Cornwall and two nights in Boyle's Court, totalling seventeen nights.

"Dora's remarks about odd days during the past terms are absurd. My position was, by arrangement, that of other parents at her school. The children were with me during holidays and I was entitled to take them out for days during the term."

Thus BR concludes that he still claims an extra seven days.

This is a typed copy of original letter, document .200321, record 19324. A sentence from the first paragraph has been left out. Colette has added some annotations in pencil.

There is a second transcription, document .052419, record 99880, which also lacks the same sentence.

There is also a literary version, document .052394, record 99859.

Meynell encloses a copy of his letter to Dora, which he's chosen to write on his and Lloyd's behalf, rather than forwarding BR's letter to her.

Enclosed is document .102116, record 116271.

Meynell asks Dora to verify BR's claim that the children were at Boyle's Court for two nights and in Cornwall August 16-31. He tells her that if it is so, both Meynell and Lloyd agree that BR is due 7 extra days, not 9. "We don't think that it is reasonable to deduct the days on which Bertie had the children out at school when they were at Telegraph House; and this should apply equally to both your and his visits to Dartington."

Enclosed with document .102115, record 116270.

Meynell encloses a letter he sent to Dora (document .102118, record 116274) and tells BR that Dora has returned from Boyle's Court.

Meynell asks BR to show him the letter from Dora, in which she wrote enthusiastically about Dartington.

This letter, no. 48, p. 68, was typed for a literary collection of their letters. It contains the fictional address "Edwardes Square" in Colette's hand and is signed with initial "M" pseudonym. There are changes to the text in Colette's hand.

There is also a carbon of this letter, document .052395, record 99860.

Document .104579hb, record 113114, letter no. 209hb in the Urch typescript contains only a one sentence match: "To-morrow I shall see you."

Meynell tells Dora that he has sorted out the holiday situation, as Dora had 10 days owing to her, and she took the children for fifteen days, charging both her and BR a day each for the children's journey, thus leaving BR with five days due to him.

"For the clothes-buying expedition, including the night and morning when Bertie was not with them, and one-way of the journey, reckon a day. That makes five and a half days in all, instead of the nine days (subsequently reduced to seven) of Bertie's claim."

Meynell has also broken up the holiday dates according to time owed to whom.

Enclosed with document .102117, record 116273.

This letter, no. 49, pp. 69-70, was prepared for a literary collection of their letters. It uses a fictional initial "M" which has been changed in ink to "C" by Colette. She has also added to the text as well as inking out some words. The fictional address is "The Manor House, Waltham St. George" when she was actually at Cox Green.

A carbon of this letter is also extant, document .052396, record 99861.

This ribbon copy contains more changes than the carbon does. The language used is similar to text she wrote on 7 August from a multi-part letter which begins on 3 August: document .104579he, record 113147, letter no. 212he. The similarities are only from paragraphs two and three of this document.

Meynell tells BR he received his telephone message, and cancelled his letter to Dora by telegram.

Meynell writes that Dora agrees that the plain division of the holidays should occur, with the first part of the holidays going to BR. "But she asks that the children should if possible go to her for Saturday next her last day of term which would give them the opportunity of seeing some of their old school friends. She would do all that was necessary in the way of meeting and convoying and they would begin their period with you on Sunday (or Monday if the Sunday trains are intolerable)."

Meynell, after his signature, writes that the following year he will probably have to bring up the question of out-of-pocket expenses, but he is currently satisfied with the finances.

Meynell tells BR that Dora has not signed the trust resignation, stating that the form is unacceptable. "This may be due to my failure to pass on a qualification by Llewelyn Davies of your power to appoint another trustee. This I have sent her today." Meynell expresses a desire to see John and Kate, but he is unsure when he will be able to do so.

This letter, no. 50, p. 71, was prepared for a literary collection of their letters. It contains the last few sentences (but not the very last one) from letter no. 200309, document .200308-9, record 99863. It is signed "L", BR's pseudonym.

A carbon copy is also extant, document .052397, record 99863.

There are also two transcriptions of the complete letter:

Document .052431, record 119341;
Document .201129, record 116269.

This letter, no. 51, p. 72, was typed for a literary collection of their letters. It uses the pseudonym initial "M", and a fictional address, "Edwardes Square", has been added in Colette's hand.

A carbon copy is also extant, document .052398, record 99864.

The text does not match the Urch typescript letter of the same date: letter no. 215hi, document .104579hi, record 113151.

This letter, no. 52, p. 53, was prepared for a literary collection of their letters. It is signed with the pseudonym initial "L".

A carbon is also extant, document .052399, record 99865. This version has corrections in Colette's hand; a sentence struck out here is retained in the carbon. This version contains fragments of the last part of the original letter, with some reworking of the text. The original letter is document .200339, record 19350.

There are also transcriptions:

Document .052437, record 99910;
Document .201138, record 116281.

These transcriptions are different typings, although they contain approximately the same text. They are not accurate transcriptions, however. Some sentences have been deleted and new ones added.

A transcription of document .200339, record 19350. There is another transcription, document .052437, record 99910. The transcriptions are different typings, although they contain the same text. They are not accurate transcriptions, however. Some sentences have been deleted and new ones added. This one has the change from "Portland" to "Portman" done in pencil while the other transcription has the change done almost invisibly.

There is also a literary version:

Ribbon, document .201162, record 116280;
Carbon, document .052399, record 99865.

This letter, no. 53, pp. 74-5, was prepared for a literary collection of their letters. It uses a fictional initial "M". Colette has added to the text as well as inking out some words.

A carbon copy is also extant: document .052400, record 99866.

This ribbon copy contains many more changes than the carbon does. It is vaguely related to letter no. 217kh, document .014579hk, record 113153 in the Urch-Malleson typescript. An extract which is similar to the Urch-Malleson typescript letter also exists, document .201208, record 116697.

Meynell informs Dora that he and Lloyd cannot recommend taking the children out of Dartington due to "... age companionship; the undesirability of a change, in itself, unless there are very strong reasons for it; and in a lesser degree, staff and technical equipment."

"There is, I want to make it clear, no kind of criticism of your school, or your qualities as an educator in either of our minds. For children of your lower average-age-group I can think of no school more satisfactory than yours."

Meynell states that the reasons Dartington was agreed on rather than Bedales was because they do not wear uniforms, did not have a holiday for the royal wedding, and do not admit to using corporal punishment.

Meynell tells BR that Dora insists that the children are unhappy at Dartington and offers, as an alternative, that they do not return to Beacon Hill School, but rather to a day school, and split the weekends between herself and BR, suggesting Tomlinson's at Wimbledon. Meynell is unsure if Dora is painting an accurate picture regarding the children's attitudes towards Dartington and asks if he should ask them himself, as well for BR's attitude towards Tomlinson. "You will remember that I have always taken the line that if Dora suggested any alternative school it should be considered."

Meynell opened the letter from Dora which BR referred to him, in which there was a "... request that she should have a note 'of the clothes that John and Kate have in the wash, that are being sent direct to Dartington'". Dora also requests that clothing she bought, "summer things etc.", be sent to Boyle's Court.

"I have had of course long letters from her in response to mine. In the first she renews the demand that the notice should be given to Dartington and I replied in the sense of my former letter. Her second letter suggest[s] that she may go to the Chancery Court."

Beneath the letter there is a handwritten note stating, "My partners heard with much pleasure my report of our talk about your family memoir." [Re The Amberley Papers.]

Meynell tells Dora that he is sending her letter to Lloyd.

He brings up one point. "The change to Dartington was made before Lloyd and I were asked to act as arbitrators, and before I was unofficially concerned in the matters in dispute between you and Bertie; so that (a) we have no standing in regard to that change and (b) we have no exact knowledge of the circumstances which the change was made—although it does appear to me that you yourself envisaged the children going to a boarding school (since you asked Bertie to inspect Bedales, for example) and at one time seem to have thought very well of Dartington."

Meynell tells BR that he and Lloyd have refused Dora's demand that provisional notice should be sent to Dartington, and that she has inquired when she will receive some money for the Dartington outfits and about the children's passports. Meynell implores BR to be generous, presumably about the outfits. The main issue has been decided in the way BR prefers (which must refer to the children staying on at Dartington).

Meynell tells BR that he has written to Dora to inform her that BR will not be making a home for the children in London, and that he and Lloyd would like the children to continue at Dartington. He would be glad to take charge of the children's passports.

Dora has asked Meynell to request the children's clothes from BR, as she paid for them.

BR wrote "Ans" in the upper left corner; it is scribbled over in the same ink.

Meynell tells Patricia he will write to BR if writing is necessary and enclose his letters to him in a separate envelope addressed to her, as she requested. "I note also as to the way letters are to be directed to you at Teneriffe. I hope that no letter other than that I now enclose will be necessary. It deals with the children's Dartington outfit...."

Meynell informs Patricia that Dartington breaks for holidays on 30 March, rather than 3 April, as Dora has notified him. The children are due to go to Telegraph House for the first part of their holiday. This may affect BR and Patricia's sailing plans for their return from Teneriffe.

There are brief notes on the verso, mainly in Patricia's hand and about a Paris contact.

The letter is unsigned. Next day Meynell replied to it, addressing BR (document .133914, record 116143) and his concerns in this letter, including "choos[ing] not to read letters" from Dora.

BR encloses a letter from Kate (not present). "The letter by itself would not have been quite conclusive, but on receiving it I wrote at once to her and John, saying would they telegraph if they wished to go to Dora first, but if they wished to come first they need not to do anything. They did not telegraph."

BR tells Meynell he tried telephoning him without success, and also returns Dora's letter (not present) which Meynell enclosed in his last letter. "I do not choose to read letters from her."

Meynell writes to BR regarding two outstanding matters. The first is John and Kate's clothing at Telegraph House, which Dora requests to have sent to her, as she needs them for her younger children.

The second is "... the question of the special expenditure of £35 on the children's initial Dartington outfits. Dora has asked us to arbitrate about this and I presume that you have no objection since it is precisely to deal with difficulties of this kind that the arbitrators were appointed." Meynell and Lloyd feel that Dora and BR should each pay half the cost.

Meynell apologizes for not being available when BR was last in town, and informs BR that Dora agrees with BR's date of 16 April, although Meynell does not know how long the holiday is.

BR tells Meynell that he's accepted Meynell's decision to split the costs of the Dartington outfits, though he feels that it was unwise of Meynell to send Dora a cheque before putting the matter before the trustees. "... The only way to get the clothes paid for out of trust funds is to bring a Chancery action, as I am a trustee as long as she is, and I will not sign a cheque for the purpose. As the children will pay for the Chancery action, I fail to see what motive she can have for not bringing it." "... You intervened, and forced me to negotiate with Dora...."

Meynell thanks BR for his cheque, "... but not for your 'general remarks'". Meynell tells BR that he will do everything he can to ensure the concordat is carried out.

A photocopy of this letter is attached. [There are other photocopies in this folder.]

Dora tells Meynell that she met with Maw the previous day regarding Davies' letter, of which Meynell has a copy. "There does not seem to be disagreement about the divorce costs, except in so far as Crompton is attempting to link the settlement of these on to the settlement of the Chancery costs, which he is strictly not entitled to do, though he may argue that if the latter are not paid he will be in difficulty in meeting the costs of the former, and in accepting the Judge's ruling that all the divorce costs are to be met by Bertie."

Dora writes, "You put it to me that argument should not continue on the basis of revengeful action. I utterly fail to see in what respect this could be charged against me. As between two parents both trustees of their children's welfare and funds...." Dora states that after the separation she agreed to buy John and Kate's clothing while they were at Beacon Hill.

Dora continues to complain at length of BR's alleged vengefulness.

Meynell informs BR that he's been corresponding with Dora, enclosing two of his letters (document .102136, record 116298 and document .102137, record 116299).

"Dora replied to the first with a restatement of her arguments for a change and with a renewal of the demand that a term's notice be given. She concludes: 'If nothing is done then I must take some decisive action.'"

Meynell mentions hearing about Crompton Llewelyn Davies' death. "I fear that it will have meant much to you."

Meynell met with Lloyd the previous day. They do not think it's advisable to give provisional notice to Dartington. "Among other objections is the fact that this would be bound to come to the ears of the children and be so unsettling. At present we do not see an alternative to Dartington." Meynell and Lloyd agreed that the children should remain in a "neutral" environment, which rules out Beacon Hill School.

Enclosed with document .102135, record 116297.

Meynell writes that he and Lloyd do not see a better alternative to Dartington and will not change their minds unless something better is presented to them, "... and that we therefore are not prepared to exert pressure on Bertie for the giving of a term's notice."

Enclosed with document .102135, record 116297.

Meynell writes that Vera Meynell's talk with the children was very satisfactory, which only strengthens his belief that Dartington is the right place for them.

He tells BR that he was made an arbitrator in the concordat for formal disagreements between BR and Dora. However, if BR does not wish for that to continue he would be more than willing to oblige.

"Dora writes today to say that she wishes to have a private talk with you about the children.... She says that the talk would be restricted severely to the children, their education present and future...."

Dora requests a meeting with the trustees. "I have been waiting to put forward points until the financial question of alimony has settled, but this is not done with yet, although it has been going on since last September. Since then I have been receiving doles on account, and pending proceedings, that amount to about half the alimony due at the original agreed rate." Dora wonders how she can be expected to care for her children under these circumstances.

She wishes to alter the holiday periods, as the children's clothes need to be examined, at the end of the term. "I adhere persistently ... that they should leave Dartington. Their timetables are already being arranged for them to do the school credit in exams, and not in regard to the things that they might be learning. John shows increasingly signs of the bad effect of the place, combined with the emotional strain he is undoubtedly feeling. There is no doubt where Kate stands. She has no wish to hurt anyone, but any arrangement by which she could get a more continuous life with me than she has at present would make her happier. The children and I have a real friendship for one another, not at all like a parent and child relation."

Dora believes that the staff at Telegraph House numbers 5 or 6 persons for 2 people.

Meynell quotes a letter from Dora regarding the children's holidays, which are from March 27 to April 29, dividing into 17 days for both Dora and BR, counting travelling days. "'As this will mean that they would have to travel to me on Easter Monday, and they disliked travelling on Boxing Day last time, I suggest that they might come to me on the Friday when they break up and then go to BR on the Sunday, returning to me on the Tuesday after Easter."

BR noted in the upper left corner that he answered "No" to the request.

Meynell tells BR that Vera told him about her conversation with BR, during which BR mentioned that Kate had written in favour of his plans. Meynell tells BR he thinks it would be useful if he saw the letter, and "Dora refuses to believe in it."

BR tells Meynell that after picking up John and Kate, Dora took them to a place called Hook's Way, about three quarters of a mile from his house, and she had been staying there for part of the time John and Kate were with BR. "A week ago, when my wife and John and Kate were out, they saw her in a car at the foot of our drive. The children guessed where she was going, and Kate was visibly unsettled throughout the rest of her time with me." BR mentions that the children are unsettled by this behaviour, knowing that Dora is nearby when they are with him, and not being able to see BR, even though he is so close, when they are with Dora.

"I think the trustees should point out to her that this behaviour is unseemly, and calculated to distress the children." There is also a handwritten note stating that this letter was sent to Lloyd as well.

Re The Amberley Papers.

BR writes to confirm his telephone conversation with Meynell, "... according to which I retain the £100 already paid, and the contract is cancelled...." Requesting that Meynell send the typescript to Leonard Woolf, Monk's House, in Sussex, BR writes "I am sorry on your account, and also that our business relations, other than over the children, have come to an end. But do not distress yourself on my account."

Meynell encloses Dora's list of "suggestions" (document .102145), which have her solicitor's initials.

Meynell replies that there seem to be a number of suggestions that will likely lead to difficult situations, but that he will hold his peace until BR looks at the list. He tells Lloyd that his chief objections are to points three and four. "It seems to me to be deplorable that the children should be called up to serve in the parents' war more than need be. In any event, if clause four means what it says, the first three points are superfluous and the fifth fantastically impossible of execution."

Titled "Mrs. Russell's Suggestions".

Document outlines a list of Dora's suggestions, in six points. Point three states that if the children should get sick and miss school that "... Dora [is] to have priority over Bertie as to their care during this time subject of course to the paramount consideration of the children's health."

Point four states that the children's wishes should be paramount unless Dora and BR agree otherwise. Point five concerns the impairment by one parent of the other parent's love for the children.

Enclosed with document .102144, record 116306.

Meynell encloses a statement from BR (document .102147, record 116309).

He tells Lloyd that he visited Dartington over the weekend, saw John and Kate, and spoke with Kate's best friend. He remarks that Dartington has matured and improved greatly since he was there last. He  mentions he will be going to Dora's Saturday and will not say any more until afterward.

Titled "Reasons for Wishing John and Kate to Stay at Dartington".

BR lists his reasons for wishing to keep John and Kate at Dartington in seven points, including reasons such as their both having friends there and that they like the place and wish to stay, stating "I have taken pains to ascertain this".

He states: "Their parents are somewhat discredited".

Enclosed with document .102146, record 116308.
 

Meynell encloses a letter and memo from Dora (document .102149, record 116311, and document .102150).

Meynell tells Lloyd he thinks it best if they maintain that their position remains unaltered, since they do not feel it best to take the children away from Dartington. "We might add that in our view it would not be 'fair' that one of the parents should be given so much more authority over the children than the other as would be implicit in her plan. But I think that might start an argument."

Dora encloses her memo for Meynell and Lloyd to read, and tells them they may forward it to BR if they wish.

Dora informs them that she's received cheques to sign for the children's school fees for the term, amounting to £100, though they are usually £90. She requested a letter detailing the increase.

Dora asked Mr. Curry at the beginning of the term to render all reports and accounts to both her and BR, which he agreed to, but she is not sure if he's done such. "I do not receive accounts, and I do think communications are sent about the children from time to time which I also do not see." She details the fees that have been included, and states that she feels the children would get far better care, for less, if they were to go to a day school or Beacon Hill with Dora, leaving her to look after the details of their home life.

Enclosed with document .102148, record 116310.

Titled "Memorandum in Regard to John and Kate Russell, and Trustees' Meeting October 1st, 1935".

Enclosed with Dora Russell's letter of Nov. 5, 1935 (document .102149, record 116311) and forwarded with Meynell's letter of Nov. 9, 1935 (document .102148, record 116310).

There are 2 carbon copies as well.

Tylor encloses (not present) an Authority for Meynell to sign; Dora has already signed it. Income from the children's account may be remitted to BR.

A short play, "Rich and Poor". Kate Russell and David Williams play two of the characters, as do Joyce Smith and John Fetherstonhaugh.

Apparently in Francis Meynell's handwriting at the top: "At B. Russell's school".

Nowell is a court welfare officer and needs to visit the Russells and the grandchildren.

BR suggests September 6 for Miss Nowell's visit.

The letter is marked "Copy". This is probably a typed copy of BR's handwritten letter.

Re correcting the paternity of a child born in wedlock, namely Harriet.

Withers tells BR to pay an unspecified account when it is convenient for him.

Re an inventory of items on the premisses, probably of Telegraph House, and insurance arrangements for T.H. and Battine House.

This letter, no. 55, p. 78, was prepared for a literary collection of their letters. It is dated 29 August 1918. The text is taken from the original letter, document .200343, record 19354.

Although this letter was begun on Thursday, 29 August 1918, these sentences come from the first paragraph of the continuation of the letter written on Friday the 30th.

There is also a carbon copy of this literary letter, document .052402, record 99868.

There are also two transcriptions of the Friday section of this letter:

Document .052441, record 99914;
Document .201141, record 116323.

Both these transcriptions are lacking some sentences.

This typed transcription of the original letter, document .200343, record 19354, lacks some sentences from that letter. A few lines from another letter (document .201140) appear at the top of page 1.

There are two other transcriptions:

Document .052440, record 99923 (Thursday section of the letter);
Document .052441, record 99914 (Friday section of the letter; lacking the same sentences as this transcription).

There is also a literary version of the letter:

Ribbon copy, document .201165, record 116322.
Carbon copy, document .052402, record 99868.

The literary version only contains a few sentences from the Friday section.

This is a transcription of the original letter, document .200307, record 19313. It contains a handwritten annotation on Francis Meynell.

There is also another transcription, document .052409, record 99871.

An edited transcription of document .200318, record 19322. The text has been edited from the original comment about Miles Malleson; there are other changes as well.

Another transcription, from a different typing, document .052412, record 99873, has the same changes.

Miss Nowell will arrive at Plas Penrhyn on Sept. 6.

A condensed transcription of an original letter, document .200312, record 19317. There is one annotation, on Prince Andre.

There is also another condensed transcription, document .052414, record 99875.

A typed transcription of an original letter, document .200314, record 19319. This transcription has two annotations in pencil: on Lowes Dickinson and Alfred North Whitehead. "T.H." has been expanded in pencil to "Telegraph House".

The document has been edited, removing references to Miles Malleson as has the other typed transcription, document .052416, record 99877.

A typed transcription of the original letter, document .200315, record 19320. There is a handwritten annotation about an "emissary" identified as being from "Scotland Yard". There is another typed transcription, document .052418, record 99879. Both transcriptions lack the last paragraph in the original letter.

Enclosed is document .101551, record 116331, a receipt for housekeeping for the three grandchildren.

Enclosed is document .101552.

Tylor thanks Edith for the codicil, duly signed, to her will.

Tylor informs BR that Mr. Justice Melford Stevenson has been transferred and therefore will not be able to hear the summons, and Tylor does not know which judge will be replacing him.

Re BR's quarterly payment of £50 to Dora Russell, i.e. Mrs. Grace.

Tylor informs BR that the summons hearing will occur at 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 25 January.