Ts. is titled "A Christmas Appeal to Save the World's Children".

BR's letter is mistakenly addressed to "Miss Elsa Hieb".

Ts. is titled "A Spring Appeal to Save the World's Children".

Ts. is titled "International Children's World Peace Crusade".

Re: general election campaign strategy for anti-nuclear movement.

Autographed offprint of "Scientists and Society" by Hildebrand: American Scientist, vol. 42, no. 3, July 1954.

Draft reply to this Vancouver resident written in margin by ER.

Relocated from H's.

Enclosed letters to Frederick Hilton.
 

BR's letter is mistakenly addressed to "Fulk [sic for Frdk] Hilton", but at that point he did not have the benefit of the next letter.

Suggests a "magnetic umbrella" to be set up over cities to repel missiles and bombs.

Declines to comment on the scientific issues of a magnetic umbrella.

"I am happy to accept the kind invitation to become an honorary member of the Oxford University Humanist Group."

Capt. B.H. Liddell Hart was the president.

Thanks him for The Free World Review and returns it having read Hinterhoff's article.

Leaflet promotes The Free World Review.

Miss Decima A. Robertson Hipwell.

Letter written on verso of photograph of Miss Robertson Hipwell.

On verso of Hirsch's letter.

"As regards Whitehead, I have dealt with him from a personal point of view in Portraits from Memory. I disagreed fundamentally with his philosophy, but for reasons of friendship I never criticized it publicly. I do not like Schopenhauer's philosophy and I have not studied [Hans] Vaihinger sufficiently to express an opinion on him."

"I have not read the book by [Jakob] Mandelker to which you allude."

"I have not studied existentialism at all carefully but what I know of it makes me think that it is rubbish."

On verso of Hirsch's letter.

Pamphlet is titled "Desde la Bomba Atomica (con Rapidez Atomica) por la Justicia y la Paz a la Humanidad Universal".

"First of all, individual ideas of that which is pleasurable vary. Sadism and masochism are common enough, and most 'normal' emotions draw on these impulses in varying degrees. The criterion I prefer is a commonsensical one. The task of ethical thought is to pursue the greatest happiness for the greatest number. How we conceive this will vary with people and with periods, and will form part of the social debate. Individuals who are at all original will, no doubt, be out of step with the notions of their contemporaries. This does not change my argument that the utilitarian criterion is the one I should wish to see generally accepted, however much individual applications of it differ."

Invoice for books and postage to Choi Ho for £1 sixteen shillings and twopence.

Re: the Lady Hoare Thalidomide Appeal.

Offprint is titled "St. Anselm's Ontological Argument and Russell's Theory of Descriptions" by Hochberg; reprinted from The New Scholasticism, 33, 3 (July 1959).

Re: Santayana.

On verso of Hoffman's letter.

On verso of Hoffmann's letter.