The card is a business card for Medlock.

Dictated reply on envelope: "Don't know anything about Camus's work and so can't write anything about it."

A partial view of the ribbon copy of the letter can be seen at record 131547.

"I enclose <not present> a polemical discussion of Strawson's essay 'On Referring' which I find is regarded, in some quarters, as successfully refuting my theory of descriptions."

Re the copyright of Jacob Epstein's bust of BR. "Lord Russell would therefore, have no right to reproduce the bust. In fact, Epstein's estate would have the right to produce further copies as no restriction was placed on this at the time or subsequently so far as I am aware."

BR encloses a brief message for publication.

A publishing approach on behalf of Musuzu Shobo.

Re Musuzu Shobo's publishing offer.

"The question of copyright is not relevant. It is the original work produced by Epstein which is the subject of copyright for the purposes we were discussing."

"I agree entirely that Lord Russell's face is an original work of art itself and under the Copyright Act, copyright would no doubt vest in the creator, whose permission to reproduce the work may be somewhat difficult to obtain."

"We have had forwarded to us by Messrs. Child & Co. a copy of a letter which they have received from a Mrs. L.H. Stickland." (See record 6704).