BRACERS Notes

Record no. Notes, topics or text
85029
85030
85031
85032
85033
85034
85035
85036
85037
85038
85039
85040
85041
85042
85043
85044
85045

Dictated reply at the top of the letter: "Article sent October 14th."

85046
85047
85048
85049
85050
85051
85052
85053
85054
85055
85056
85057
85058
85059
85060
85061
85062
85063
85064
85065
85066
85067
85068
85069
85070
85071
85072
85073
85074
85075

BR requests a permanent reader's ticket for C. Farley.

85076

BR answered this letter on 9 December 1964 (record 8405). It is a mystery why the copy should appear to be the original BR received.

85077
85078
85079
85080
85081
85082
85083
85084
85085
85086
85087
85088
85089
85090
85091
85092
85093
85094
85095
85096
85097
85098
85099
85100
85101
85102
85103

Also in file: another TD(D), document .403252. BR has made handwritten additions to his reply to Bradley's telegram. His reply was then re-typed.

This reply was communicated to Bradley by telephone on 16 June 1960.

85104
85105
85106
85107
85108
85109
85110
85111
85112

BR encloses "Two Armament Experts: American and Russian"; not present.

85113

Bradley thanks BR for "Two Armament Experts: American and Russian" and will notify BR as soon as possible if it is to be published.

85114

Bradley returns BR's "Two Armament Experts: American and Russian" because the style is different than the New York Times'.

85115

King requests an interview with BR on behalf of the New York Times.

85116
85117
85118
85119
85120
85121
85122
85123
85124
85125
85126

On the verso of the transcription of the cable received from Bradley, are notes in Edith Russell's hand:

"NY Times Mag. 2500 word article $300.
Does he think Communism a menace. If not, why not? If so, what can be done about it?
especially reference to Cuban and Indo-Sino crises"

85127
85128