BR is to cable dates for the award event.

BR asks for a specific date for the Kalinga Award.

BR will make a short speech on Jan. 28, in French if it is translated for him.

BR encloses his acceptance speech (not present).

In French.

BR will attend the press conference.

Speech by Professor Pierre Auger at the Kalinga Prize ceremony for BR.

Lamont is in Paris. The clipping is another letter about  BR on Vietnam.

Lamont encloses another letter to the editor defending BR. He is asking counsel to force an apology from Robert Conquest for calling him "communist-line".

Lamont had distributed BR's statement on nuclear war with slight changes.

Lamont thanks BR for his letter about the work of the BRPF and encloses $500.

Lamont expects President Johnson to make peace in Vietnam after the elections.

Lamont encloses $2000 and tells of plans to ask for Johnson's impeachment "for his various crimes".

Lamont conveys the Committee's greetings on BR's 95th birthday.

On Einstein.

BR will miss seeing Lamont.

BR has read Dialogues on Santayana and Dewey. Has Kallen an animus against BR?

BR thanks Lamont for his contribution to the Committee of 100.

BR agrees that a peaceful resolution of the Berlin problem is likely.

BR, apologizing on the delay in replying, reveals that "we are now 14 Committees of 100".

BR is grateful for the Tom Paine Award.

BR has been watching developments in "the South Vietnam controversy".

BR discusses his approach to revising the passage on negroes in Marriage and Morals. See document .051969a, enclosed with this letter.

BR quotes his letter to the New York Times on negroes.

More on BR's retraction of any white superiority.

BR is glad that Lamont is distributing BR's statement on accidental war. He offers his essay on Santayana.

BR thanks Lamont for his contribution to the BRPF.

BR thanks Lamont for his wife's "most valuable pamphlet" on Vietnam. He encloses a recent statement (not present).

BR encloses a statement (not present) for a press conference on the Warren Report and asks for Lamont's donation.

BR thanks Lamont for his donation to the BRPF.

BR is interested in Lamont's plans to call for Johnson's impeachment.

A clipping of Gorky's article from L'Humanité, Paris, 10 September 1920.

Kastner addresses a note to BR at the top of a mimeographed article about John R. Emens, President of Ball State Teachers College. Kastner has profusely and sarcastically annotated the mimeo.

BR encloses a statement (not present) in favour of King-Hall's book, Defence in the Nuclear Age. BR thinks that non-violent resistance might not be ineffective against the present rulers of Russia and refers to his 1915 article on non-resistance.

In German.

A holograph note: "Sidney Hook became a professor. I had a sharp controversy with him in 1958, as to whether the extermination of mankind would be better or worse than a communist victory."

A transcription of document .051279; also a carbon copy.

Hook draws BR's attention to Corliss Lamont's politics.

On trusting communists.

Extracts from a letter on solipsism and "hypothetical realism".

BR has dated the extracts 1913, but a typescript of the original letter (record 132290) at Columbia shows the true date of 1912. The RL number is that of Ladd-Franklin's letter, being document .051908.

A thank-you letter. The professors' incoming letter is not in RA, but it is reproduced in facsimile on the dustjacket of the first American edition of Dear Bertrand Russell, and on p. 36 of the first British edition (p. xxxvi of the American). See record 119869.

Not indicated on the reproductions is the notation in the upper-left corner, "Ans / copy attached". This can be seen on the photocopy of the letter in the printer's copy of Dear BR (document RA2 210.147507).

Re a leave of absence.

Written in BR's hand at the top of Lamont's letter of 29 March 1956, document .051919.

On homosexuality as nature's way of limiting population growth: does BR recognize this? Housman refers obliquely to A.E. Housman. Housman still regards BR as a pacifist, although they haven't spoken for years and BR has modified his position.

BR cables regarding a passage on the Matusow case, written on document .051923.
 

Howard provides details of his troubles.

BR tells Howard that his story is a "dreadful" one.

In praise of What I Believe.

Lamont suggests that since the New York Times will resume publication on March 28, BR should send his "Vietnam" letter there also.

Lamont is airmailing letters to the New York Times re BR's article and is quoting BR on race in his reply to one that cites Marriage and Morals.

Lamont notes the Bantam paperback of Marriage and Morals still has the statement on race and suggests BR publicly announce that future editions will omit the passage.

Lamont suggests BR himself write to the New York Times Magazine.

This is the letter to which Lamont refers in his telegram of 21 April 1963. Also enclosed is a poor photocopy of BR's letter to Lamont of 23 October 1957 and the letters to the editor pages of the New York Times Magazine, 21 April 1963. A better photocopy of BR's letter is in Rec. Acq. 17j.

On the non-genetic superiority of whites to blacks in Marriage and Morals. This copy was sent to BR by Lamont on 22 April 1963; see document .051951a.

Lamont tries to persuade BR that his anti-Goldwater campaign may "boomerang". The chances of Goldwater's defeat are already overwhelming.

Lamont defends Fred J. Cook's The Warfare State. It seems that BR suggested Lamont write this letter.

BR requests that the passage concerning negroes (blacks) in his Marriage and Morals be replaced and suggests ways of accomplishing the replacement. Attached to BR's letter of same date to Corliss Lamont.

The author of the letter invites BR to provide his views on the unity of Europe.

This note in BR's hand appears on document .051524, record 77453, a letter from Cyril Joad on 15 June [1917]. The text, which probably was not addressed to Joad, is: "Come to 'ship', Whitehall, 1.15 today to lunch (instead of here)". (A check of BR's correspondence with Constance Malleson does not indicate that she was the lunch partner.)

John reminds BR that he once posed for a painting that was never finished. Now he would love to make at least a drawing of br.

Clough Williams-Ellis has promised John a suitable room at Portmeirion in which to paint BR's portrait.

Again a delay has occurred in John's quest to paint BR's portrait.

John had determined to take part in the demonstration (of the Committee of 100), but his doctor intervened and forbade it.

BR would prefer sittings after April.

BR thanks the Red Dean of Canterbury for his book: "As I am neither a Christian nor a communist, you will not be surprised if I do not altogether agree with it."

Jones, who calls himself a psychologist, questions BR on his concept of causation as correlation.

Jones now sends comments on The Problems of Philosophy.

Jones has ideas on the teaching of mathematics. He refers to an essay in Philosophical Essays (probably "The Study of Mathematics").

BR's notation at the top is a reference to Whitehead: "Show ANW".

Jourdain asks BR to vet the enclosed account (not present) by Stella Browne of the Brotherhood Church incident.

Jourdain says he feels for BR "in all the disagreeable incidents through which you have passed."

Shelby has read BR's "The Essence of Religion" and wishes to know if BR has written anything else on this topic.

An exhibition regarding Xu Zhimo (his name in pin-yin) was due at King's College, Cambridge in 2014: http://www.kings.cam.ac.uk/news/2014/zhimo-exhibition.html.

BR's note consists of 5 sentences on C. Hamilton Hsu, who "was killed on his way home to China."

On Ogden's "International Philosophy" series, and BR's suggestion of translating Su Hu's Principles of Chinese Philosophy.

Re meeting with BR and Chinese students on Dec. 10.

A Christmas card, signed by Hsu.

A brief note on "Edwin" and Georgie Greenwood.

Keller is glad of BR's reply of June 9 agreeing to send a message for the next Grotius Day and to look through his manuscripts for something in the spirit of Grotius. The booklet, disbound now, is by Keller and concerns "International Law Begins at Home".

BR has written the text of a telegram on the verso of a letter from E.J. Gumbel, document .050531, record ?: "Viendrons demain deux heures black hotel louvois". This is presumably a telegram from Dora Black Russell to BR.

On Lane's personal life with references to Santayana.

On Human Knowledge.

On BR's theory of perception.

On theory of perception.

On theory of perception.

On theory of perception.

Laric would like to visit BR on Feb 4.

BR is engaged the whole day Feb. 4 "with an important matter".

Zora and Robert Lasch want to visit BR, who has annotated the letter: "11th?"

Lasch says that the 11th may be impossible.

Lasch thanks BR for the visit and is happy that BR is "looking so well and vigorous".

Laski is glad of BR's review of his book and brings up Sheffer's case.

A transcription of document .051996.

Laski will send BR some legal papers and distribute BR's "word" on Sheffer. Laski criticizes American universities.

A transcription of document .051998. BR has corrected it.

On Ralph Barton Perry and Sheffer.

A transcription of document .052000.

On American illiberal politics. Sheffer's paper is being sent to BR.

A transcription of document .052002.

BR has queried Laski's 1919 dating, which is obviously incorrect. Laski says it is "splendid" to have BR's telegram on Sheffer.

A transcription of document .052004.

Sheffer's situation at Harvard. Laski is sick of America.